Prediction of Peter Polansky [721st] vs Teimuraz Gabashvili [881st] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L W L L L L L L
Form
W W W W L W L W L WH2H: Polansky 1 - 1 Gabashvili
They have played 5 sets in total, with Polansky winning 2 and Gabashvili winning 3. The last match between Polansky and Gabashvili was at the US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston, 08-04-2017, Q1 round, Clay with Teimuraz Gabashvili getting the victory 6-2 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Peter Polansky | 1 |
| Teimuraz Gabashvili | 1 |
| Polansky | Stats | Gabashvili |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 721 | Ranking | 881 |
| 110 | Highest Rank | 43 |
| 36 | Age | 39 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 19 | Titles | 11 |
| 56% (541-428) | Career Total W/L | 53% (674-596) |
| $541,225 | Career Prize Money | $1,636,260 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Polansky VS Gabashvili H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Peter Polansky
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
49%
(
39 of
80)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
| 1-6 6-3 7-6(4) | |||||
Polansky VS Gabashvili H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 22 | Games Won | 28 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 0:49:44 | Average Match Time | 0:49:44 |
| 49% (39/80) | 1st Serve % | 53% (33/62) |
| 67% (26/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (23/33) |
| 41% (17/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 59% (17/29) |
| 100% (2/2) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (4/14) |
| 35% (22/62) | Return Points Win % | 46% (37/80) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Peter Polansky vs Teimuraz Gabashvili Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Polansky 1 - 1 Gabashvili
Editorial Prediction:
Peter Polansky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Polansky
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michail Pervolarakis
Player
Peter Polansky
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
27
Total Points Won
31
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Peter Polansky
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Jc Aragone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Peter Polansky
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
16
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 7-6(2) 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Tennys Sandgren
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
9
Aces
26
3
Double Faults
10
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
50 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Peter Polansky
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Teimuraz Gabashvili Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Marko Maksimovic
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Sami Ben Abdennibi
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
10
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
80
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 5-7 6-2 10-7 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Mert Alkaya
Player
Teimuraz Gabashvili
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
52%
(
58 of
112)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
13
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
37 of
58)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-3 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Aziz Ouakaa
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Pablo Trochu
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
9
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Teimuraz Gabashvili
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
73%
(
53 of
73)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
73)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (541/428) | Win/Loss | 53% (674/596) |
| 55% (1253/1017) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (1578/1475) |
| 52% (11403/10573) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (14907/14264) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.26 |
| 2813 | Aces Total | 3711 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 1705 | Total Double Faults | 3815 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 596.78 | Average Opponent Rank | 575.07 |
| 58% (26796/46045) | 1st Serve % | 58% (39976/68588) |
| 70% (18710/26796) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (28314/39984) |
| 52% (10024/19249) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (13842/28595) |
| 40% (1654/4123) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (2690/6529) |
| 38% (17382/45889) | Return Points Win % | 39% (26776/68997) |
| 57% (527/932) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (641/1193) |
| 26% (7/27) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 39% (24/62) |
| 53% (195/368) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (207/405) |
| 48% (146/306) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (243/441) |
| 85% (545/464) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (639/531) |
| 15% (545/80) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (639/107) |
| 18% (423/75) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (628/139) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
